A public apology to Charlotte Vere

You see, if there's one reason why I could never be a politician, it's because I'm crap at arguing in person due to my poor memory and inability to remember important facts and figures. If there's a second reason, it's because I can bring myself to say things like  "I was wrong" and "I'm sorry". That's what I am going to do now.

I want to issue a public apology to Charlotte Vere, the Conservative candidate for Brighton Pavilion.

Yes, you read that correctly.

Earlier in my blog I accused her of being bitter and aggressive toward the Green Party. Indeed, from first reading her tweets this is how I perceived the situation.

What I have since realised is just quite how annoying the Greens actually are. Their persistent re-positioning, their perfect-world mentality and their general sanctimonious tone stinks of desperation and is just too much for me to bear. I really can't blame Charlotte for rising to them.

Of course I haven't even mentioned their policies. The problem is not just that I can't disagree with any of them, but that they are apparently funded by an pot of infinite cash (see possibly the only Conservative blog post I'll ever agree with).

Lastly, the irony that the "Green" party have posted more fliers through my letterbox than any other party - often the same content laid out differently. Someone tell me that this isn't a complete waste of time, money and natural resources.

So here it is - Charlotte, I'm genuinely sorry for my earlier comments. Now I have this in context I can understand where you were coming from, and I have found new respect for you in the way you have publicly challenged the Greens on their policies.

Though I shall still be voting for Labour's Nancy Platts, any affection I had for the Green Party is slowly being ground away by their own representatives.

A plea to those swayed by the latest Tory poster campaign

This poster makes me physically sick. Why? Because of the amount of people who will buy into the cheapness of a message that is conveyed so dishonestly.

I'm sick of hearing people talk about "...my taxes being spent on people who don't want to work" and "...people who sit at home claiming benefits when there's nothing wrong with them". Please, let me educate those of you who have been fortunate enough to never be in this position.

Firstly, you lose your job. You find yourself signing on and you receive approximately £60 per week with which to support yourself and possibly your family. That's approximately £8.50 per day. For this £8.50 per day, you have to feed and clothe yourself and your family, as well as pay all the household bills. You also have to search for work and get yourself to and from interviews. Now I don't know about elsewhere in the country, but in Brighton bus travel alone will cost you £3.60 per day.

Now just think about that for a minute. What do YOUR monthly bills come in at? How much is your weekly shop? How much do you spend on travel each week? I'm willing to wager that the three combined come in at well over £60 per week alone.

So you struggle to pay your bills, you receive a number of final demands, you may well get credit blacklisted. Of course if you're lucky and you have some savings put aside, it may take a couple of months to get to this stage, but I would suggest this is not a common scenario for many of the people that you like to label "bums".

You go to interviews. You don't get the job. This happens regularly and your confidence suffers. Your mental health suffers as a result. Some people are stronger than others. Some may look for a crutch at this point and may find it in drugs or alcohol, others unknowingly start destroying relationships around them.

Before you judge, try to imagine what it must be like to have hit that low.

You go to seek advice. The Job Centre don't want to know, they just want to get people into jobs, so the hardest to help are left to the bottom of the pile. The support agencies employed on government contracts have targets to reach and again you fall to the bottom of the pile. Right now your debts are getting larger and larger and you may well start claiming housing benefit just to keep a roof over your head.

Alcoholism or drug dependence then starts eating into your money. Even those lucky enough to avoid such crutches are not spared, for depression is on the horizon. We've all been unfortunate enough to watch daytime television - being forced to sit through it daily is enough to send anyone on a downward spiral. Joking aside though, if you've ever been out of work for any period of time you'll know how it can affect your confidence. So you start looking for jobs that perhaps aren't what you would like to do. You don't get them. Why? Because you don't have the necessary skills/qualifications (don't get me started on NVQs) and experience. Alternatively one agency or another puts your forward for a position that you don't particularly want, and this comes through no matter how much you may try to hide it.

Again - just think about that for a moment. If the bottom fell out of the market that you work in and you were forced to start from the bottom just to get back into work - how would YOU feel?

Now imagine that you took that job simply because you needed the money. How motivated would you be? How productive would you be? How much of an impact would that have on your family, friends, colleagues and anyone else you came in to contact with? Again, think before you judge.

Back to the unemployed. So, you finally access to support to retrain or gain experience before applying for work (there are many good schemes run locally at present, I've no idea how widely available they are) and you put together an action plan with an advisor. I should point out that due to funding restrictions, the advisor cannot see you as often as you need, due to their high client caseload. You're referred to other agencies for training courses. You wait. And you wait. And you wait some more. You finally manage to enrol on the course that you want, that will give you the skills you need to go into the sector that you want to work in. Great! Even better - it's free because you're unemployed!

But hold on a minute.

You've been offered some part-time work. One of your interviews came good, but it clashes with your course dates.

Never mind. You manage to rearrange the dates to fit. Hang on though, the course is no longer free, because you are no longer unemployed. You're now either not eligible, or you have to pay a fee that you can't afford. Remember, throughout all this period of unemployment you've been getting in more and more debt.

So what do you do? The course that will allow you to get back into the type of work you want to do, or the part-time job for a few weeks because you desperately need the money? I'm glad that I have never had to personally make this decision, but I have seen many clients in a similar position. It's no wonder that unemployment can cause many mental health conditions - I won't lecture you on the effects of depression, but I suggest that you look it up yourself, or better still talk to the individuals going through it right now, because only then can you realise how being unemployed affects your confidence and motivation, no matter how much you want to be in work.

So yes, the benefits system does need some tweaking, but is withdrawing support for "those that don't want to work" the appropriate mechanism for correcting the situation? No, it's not. Yes, there are those that abuse the system. But these people will find a way around any system. Can you really support a welfare state that withdraws all benefits, most likely causing mental health problems for those most in need? Which will, in the long-run, prove a much bigger drain on national resources anyway?

This latest Tory campaign is callous, cold, uncaring and dishonest in the way it presents the scenario.

In my day job I am employed to broker work placements for unemployed people. Those same people who complain about "their taxes" being spent on supporting these people are unwilling to help them in the simplest of ways. You would think that these people, so upset that "their taxes" are being spent on benefits, would want to do all they could to support people back in to work. I mean, they're even getting a free pair of hands - that's free labour! But no. They don't want to offer any help to the local community. The irony here is that one simple short-term, part-time placement would offer so much more to the local community than "their taxes". It would immediately make the client more employable and is therefore potentially one less claimant. And of course, the client is now finding that they can't even find UNPAID work! A real confidence-booster if ever there was one...

So in summary- when you work, as I do, with the longest-suffering individuals that DO want to work, and you see the barriers that they come up against - you start to understand that even those that you perceive to be "sitting at home on benefits" have issues that run much deeper than simply finding a job.

Finally, has anyone told Mr Cameron that there aren't actually that many jobs out there at the moment anyway?