Saturday, 27 March 2010

Further thoughts on why I'm supporting Labour

In my eagerness to get out of the house, I finished the previous post in a bit of a rush and didn't really clarify my reasons for supporting Labour in great detail.

Ultimately, it comes down to needing to find a party to trust in the upcoming election. Yeah yeah... I can hear you sniggering and asking why I would put my trust in a party that has failed on so many of it's pre-election promises. Well, as I mentioned in my previous post, I can't say I whole-heartedly trust any political party, but let's face it - it's crunch time and it's time to pick sides.

I just can't trust David Cameron. He comes across like so many of the heartless, high-powered, self-obsessed executives I've worked for and his party show continued disrespect to the lesser-privileged individuals in society. Their communication is unclear, unsubstantiated and shows a lack of understanding of how engage with the working class. At best, their policies to provide help to those who need it are unrealistic. At worst, they are patronising. Their sums don't add up, and crucially their plan to repay the public spending deficit does not seem to be backed up with any explanation of how this will be funded. When you look at their other pledges, such as the promise to get people off welfare and back in to work, I can't help but think that this hole will be filled by substantial cuts to services for those most in need.

Labour have introduced many initiatives and services that have improved life significantly for those most in need, and indeed the Conservatives opposed many of the projects. The one that stands out, of course, is their opposition to the minimum wage.

Most worrying is Cameron's continued insistence of the magnificence of Margaret Thatcher's leadership.

So Gordon Brown may not be the most inspirational leader. He may not have been elected by the public. But what he and his government have done is stabilise an economy badly hit by and INTERNATIONAL recession - not a recession caused by the current government as David Cameron would like you to believe. To change government and move in the direction that the Tories are proposing would risk significantly damaging the recovery, and put the most vulnerable in an even tighter situation.

But crucially, the pledge that finally swayed my vote can be found in Gordon Brown's election pledge speech:

I know that in this time of cynicism and lack of trust in politics, there are some people who will say that politicians will promise the earth but never deliver, that a pledge isn’t worth the paper it is written on.

And I understand that, but these are not general pledges without dates, without tests, without scrutiny. these are our pledges to every single citizen, tied to timetables, regular reporting and proof of performance.

So I want to build-in accountability mechanisms to the pledges we are making, so that you can hold me to account, and we can test our progress against our promises in the year to come.

I believe the business of government should be more business-like – that the British people are the boss and like any employer they deserve to know about the performance of their team.

And so I am proposing the following.

Firstly, Sir Tim Berners Lee, the man most associated with the invention of the internet, is the government’s advisor on data openness and transparency all across the internet.

In the months to come he will be ensuring that there is the maximum possible information available to the public at all times.

This rapid extension of transparency will show in real time how government are delivering against our pledges.

Now understand, as I mentioned previously, Labour are very much in the last chance saloon with me. If Labour can make good on this promise, I believe this will sway many of the doubters.

It has taken me months to arrive at this decision. I have deliberated over every little detail, many of which I would have to admit that I don't understand. However, I realise that I now need to put my faith somewhere, and the only party that seem to be able to back up what they say with real facts and figures are the Labour party.

Untangling the Brighton Pavilion parliamentary web

When I sat down to write this blog an hour ago, I was going to ask the Brighton Pavilion candidates to help sway me, as I was completely undecided which way to vote. Now before I continue, please be clear on something - despite my constant Tory-bashing, I am equally suspicious of all politicians. For me, it's always a case of picking the best of a bad bunch. Personally I think the whole system needs an overhaul and fresh set of faces, but let's put that to one side and get realistic for a minute - that's not going to happen any time soon.

So I sat down with all the fliers that have dropped through my letterbox lately and worked my way through all the facts, figures, spin and hyperbole. In doing so I found that my decision is actually quite an easy one. Let me take you through how I got there.

Social Networking
Working in the community sector in Brighton and Hove, part of my job involves seeking out opportunities to work in collaboration with local businesses and people. This means I spend a certain amount of time on the popular social networking site Twitter. Now the thing about Twitter is that some people get it, and some don't. Some people understand the impact of the way they present themselves on Twitter, and some don't. The three main candidates for Brighton Pavilion can all be found on Twitter, and I have been watching them all closely for some time now.

Now I have to admit that Labour candidate Nancy Platts does have a slight advantage here, in that I have been lucky enough to spend some time talking to her face-to-face. Nancy contacted me through Twitter to discuss my work. I found her to be interesting and engaging, and refreshingly genuine. She explained the local political landscape to me without spin and she is both honest and humble. Take a look at her tweets - polite, engaging, factual and relevant.

Those same words can be used for the Green Party leader Caroline Lucas, who also come across very well. Of course I wouldn't expect less from a forward-thinking party such as the Greens. Ben Duncan, Green Party candidate for Kemptown, also comes across very well.

However, let's take a look at the feed for Charlotte Vere, the local Conservative candidate. Aggressive, irrelevant, bitter, defensive, isolating, and quite frankly - dull. But then, if she spent a little more time promoting her party's policies and less time whining at her followers she might actually risk connecting with people. That's not really the Tory way, is it? Well, not unless there's money involved.

I can only presume that Liberal Democrat Bernie Millam has given up the chase, as until I googled the candidate details I had no idea who their representative was.

Local Campaigning
I pulled together everything that has come through my door. Now clearly as leader of the Greens, Caroline Lucas is throwing everything she can into this campaign, include a whole lot of paper through my letterbox. Isn't that somewhat ironic, from the Green party?

Now initially I found myself being swayed towards the Green vote. After all, their fliers clearly state that unless we vote Green, the Conservatives will be voted in.

I have to say this is a particularly good piece of spin from the Greens, with a graph to "clearly illustrate" the level of support for the Green Party in Brighton Pavilion. The small print reveals that the figures are based on an opinion poll of 533 adults interviewed by telephone in December 2009. I note there is no clarification on where the phone numbers were sourced from, or that these are adults based in Brighton.

Now I really don't question the integrity of these figures, but they fail to tell the whole story. In 2005 the Green Party came third in the general election. They were 6,000 votes behind Labour, and nearly 900 behind the Tories. As far as I can see, this means that voting Green is actually a damn risky strategy that could in fact ENSURE that the Tories gain control, not prevent them from doing so.

Charlotte Vere sent me a very boring letter which I wish I hadn't put straight in to the recycling.

And as for the Lib Dems... well, they're a bit quiet around these parts...

National Policy
I like Caroline Lucas. She seems genuine. The Green Party, on the face of it, seem to have the answers. They could very well be the fresh face of British politics that we so badly need right now. The only problem is that they fail to back it up.

I WANT to vote Green, I really do. So I checked out the policies page on their website. It makes great reading, it really does. However, I have to say that it really doesn't stand up to scrutiny. It's all very well having a destination, but you also need to show us the route to get there.

I give the Greens great credit for campaigning positively, as sadly the same cannot be said of the Lib Dems. I'm sick of hearing constant critisism from Nick Clegg, when his tired old party don't show any sign of imagination or ability to provide solutions to the country's problems.

I've said enough in the past about my reasons for not voting Conservative, so I don't feel any need to expand any further right now.

Now, Labour. I've decided to support Nancy Platts in the forthcoming election, but I have to say that they're in the last chance saloon with me. I can't stomach the thought of a Conservative government and voting Green seems far too risky, but that doesn't mean that I'm anywhere near happy with the current government. Gordon Brown must surely realise that if they win the election a lot of things have to change, and quickly. However, locally I feel that Nancy has the ability to make a difference. I was very impressed with her understanding of social issues and as far as I can see she is the only candidate who is permanently resident in the area.

THAT is why, for now at least, I am supporting Labour.

Monday, 25 January 2010

Bandwagon ahoy!

Disrespectful exploitation by the opposition leader

I'm not going to comment too much on this one. There's a great article on the Times website which says more than I possibly could. Personally my favourite part is the part that the Tories would struggle to comprehend:

"There has never been a time when our society has been richer, lived longer, been more tolerant, guaranteed women greater opportunities, cared better for the sick and disabled or done more to provide education for all."

I hope I can find a million people who can see through this crap...

This is the sort of uneducated rubbish I would expect from Conservative supporters

So let's address those points one by one:

1. "The Labour Party has been in power for around thirteen years and has become complacent and reactionary. The imput of new blood into the government would bring fresh ideas as well as bring the Labour government to account for its failures. An example of a fantastic Conservative idea is the suggestion to allow the public to table bills in Parliament, if backed by one million petition signatories."

Is this really the best you can do? Any change in power would bring fresh ideas. Doesn't mean they're good. I'll give kudos to the one million signatories idea, but would I trust the Tories to go through with it? No chance.

2. "The economic stimulus it seems was very necessary in order to prevent total economic collapse. However, now that the danger has receded, a Conservative government is needed in these austere times to really sort out the state's finances."

Google Black Wednesday. I'll say no more.

3. "According to our opponents David Cameron's descent from aristocracy is a bad thing. Of course, this is just prejudice and should be completely abhorrent to all rational people."

The same way Gordon Brown is attacked for being Scottish or visually impaired? What's good for the goose...

4. "David is a fan of The Smiths. Need I say more?"

You're a poncy little rich kid with no grasp on reality, aren't you? I bet you're a student and you think this comment is oh-so-kitsch.

5. "He projects a confident image and is an excellent communicator. This is in stark contrast to our current Prime Minister, who struggles to get his message across and is often socially awkward."

Cameron is a PR guru. Do you trust every smartly-dressed salesman who calls at your door? Do you look down on anyone who is not dressed in suit and tie? Actually, I'm guessing you probably do...

6. "Just look at the reasons put forward on our opposing group's page. Mostly slanderous hate-mongering and prejudice. This is in itself a reason to support Mr Cameron."

Translation: "Look at us, we're much better than them." Yep, a pretty standard Tory standpoint.

7. "He has had the best education available in the world, attending Eton and then Oxford University where he achieved 1st class honours in Philosophy, Politics & Economics...surely as appropriate subjects as there can be for a potential Prime Minister. While some may sneer at this 'privileged' background, that is simply inverted snobbery and should be considered as ridiculous as looking down on anyone simply because of their background rather than what they have to offer."

More unsubstantiated  nonsense.  If the education was so important, why did this not help Cameron in his role as chief advisor to Norman Lamont in 1993? As with any career - you can learn as much as you like academically, putting it in to practice, however...

8. "By voting for Cameron/Tories, you not only get David Cameron [obviously] but a heavy weight cabinet behind him : Ken Clarke, William Hague, Liam Fox, George Osborne, Michael Gove, Chris Grayling, Oliver Letwin, Francis Maude, Theresa May, Sayeeda Warsi and David Willetts to name a few! Take a look for yourselves at the embarassment that is the only realistic alternative : http://www.labour.org.uk/cabinet"

Sorry? You appear not to have completed your point there. What was the term you used earlier? "Mostly slanderous hate-mongering and prejudice"?

9. "Labour's HUGE spending increases (funded by increased taxes) have been used so inefficiently the gap between rich and poor in the UK is the widest since records began despite Labour claiming to look out for the poorer members of society."

Well, we can only imagine how much worse it would be under a Conservative government...

I'll let you finish the rest of the "arguments" off for yourselves. I can only hope that people don't buy in to this shit. I mean, just look at the way the group is written and the language used - you can immediately tell who the target audience is, and you can almost feel them looking down upon us...

Saturday, 23 January 2010

Frank Turner says it better than I ever could...

Just a subtle reminder of what Mr Cameron's hero was all about:

Wednesday, 6 January 2010

Caught on camera - Conservatives remove people from social housing in Hammersmith and Fulham

A lovely secret video here, with Tory councillor Stephen Greenhalgh squirming under fire while trying to deny his intentions.

Dear Mr Cameron - who's going to pay for this then?

Clearly public schooling isn't what it used to.

Someone needs to learn to do their sums

Anyone got a spare £34bn lying around?